SB 324 California Senate · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising.

Summary
Existing law generally prohibits a manufacturer of alcoholic beverages and a winegrower from paying, crediting, or compensating a retailer for advertising or paying or giving anything of value for the privilege of placing a sign or advertisement with a retail licensee. It authorizes, as an exception, the holder of a winegrower's license, a beer manufacturer, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent, to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee, under certain conditions, if the on-sale retail licensee is the owner, manager, agent of the owner, assignee of the owner's advertising rights, or major tenant of specified facilities. This bill would expand the exceptions to existing law to allow beer manufacturers, winegrowers, distilled spirits rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agents to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, on-sale retail licensees at specified facilities located in the City of Inglewood, as provided. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that a violation of any of its provisions for which another penalty or punishment is not specifically provided is a misdemeanor. This bill would expand existing crimes by imposing additional requirements on a licensee under the act, thus, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Inglewood. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jul 2013
Senate Passage
Apr 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Feb 19, 2013 Signed Aug 27, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly Aug 8, 2013

How they voted

33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Apr 25, 2013
D Democratic26
24 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 27, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 8, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-1)
assembly
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 16, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 25, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 465.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors