Water recycling.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board, referred to as the state board, and the California regional water quality control boards, referred to as regional boards, as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to investigate the feasibility of developing uniform water recycling criteria for direct potable reuse, as defined, and to provide a final report on that investigation to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2016. Existing law also requires the department to complete a public review draft of its report by June 30, 2016. This bill would require the department, in consultation with the state board, to investigate the feasibility of developing uniform water recycling criteria for direct potable reuse and to provide a final report on that investigation to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2016. This bill would also require the department to complete the public review draft of its report by September 1, 2016. (2) Existing law requires an expert panel to be convened and administered by the department and requires the expert panel to be comprised of, at a minimum, an epidemiologist, a microbiologist, and a chemist, among others. Existing law authorizes the department to appoint an advisory group, task force, or other group, comprised of no fewer than 9 representatives of specified entities to advise the department regarding the development of uniform water recycling criteria for direct potable reuse. This bill would require the department to convene and administer the expert panel on or before February 15, 2014. The bill would require the expert panel, in addition to its existing responsibilities, to assess any additional areas of research that are needed to be able to establish uniform regulatory criteria for direct potable reuse and recommend an approach for accomplishing any of the additional needed research regarding uniform criteria for direct potable reuse in a timely manner. The bill would also require the expert panel to include a limnologist. The bill would require the department to convene the advisory group, task force, or other group, on or before January 15, 2014, and would subject the advisory group to specific open meetings provisions. The bill would further expand the list of specified entities from which the representatives of the advisory group, task force, or other group could be selected to include, among others, the department, the state board, ratepayer or taxpayer advocate organizations, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The bill would require, on or before June 30, 2016, the department to prepare a draft report summarizing the recommendations of the expert panel. The bill would authorize the department to contract with a public university or other research institution for purposes of the expert panel. (3) Existing law also authorizes the department to accept funds from any source and use those funds, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for certain purposes. This bill would instead authorize the department to accept funds from nonstate sources and use those funds for certain purposes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 19, 2013
Signed Oct 8, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 11, 2013
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
14
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Oct 8, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0)
assembly
Sep 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2379.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 21).
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Jul 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 26, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and W.,P. & W.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 989.) (May 20).
upper
May 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 7, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 788.) (May 1).
upper
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ben Hueso
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 322
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 322. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline