School safety: door locks.
Summary
Existing law, the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998, requires the State Allocation Board to allocate to applicant school districts prescribed per-unhoused-pupil state funding for construction and modernization of school facilities, including hardship funding and supplemental funding for site development and acquisition. Existing law requires all new construction projects submitted to the Division of the State Architect pursuant to the act to include locks that allow doors to classrooms and rooms with an occupancy of 5 or more persons to be locked from the inside, except as specified. This bill, on and after January 1, 2016, would additionally require all modernization projects submitted to the Division of the State Architect pursuant to those provisions to include those locks, except as specified. The bill would require the State Allocation Board to adopt regulations to adjust the modernization per-pupil grant allowance to reflect the associated cost of installing the locks. This bill would, if federal funding becomes available for purposes of school safety, require a school district to first consider using these funds to install locks that are lockable from the inside in every classroom and every room with an occupancy of 5 or more persons, except as specified. By imposing new requirements on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 27, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1011.) (May 23).
upper
May 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 786.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 316
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 316. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline