Mortgages: foreclosure notices: title companies.
Summary
Existing law requires a mortgage servicer, mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to, among other things, contact the borrower prior to filing a notice of default to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure, as specified. Existing law, until January 1, 2018, prohibits a mortgage servicer, mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from recording a notice of default if a foreclosure prevention alternative is approved in writing prior to the recordation of a notice of default under certain circumstances. Existing law, operative January 1, 2018, prohibits a mortgage servicer, trustee, mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from recording a notice of sale or conducting a trustee's sale while a foreclosure prevention alternative application submitted by the borrower is pending, as specified. Existing law, until January 1, 2018, prohibits a mortgage servicer, trustee, mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from recording a notice of default, notice of sale, or conducting a trustee's sale while a complete first lien loan modification application submitted by the borrower is pending, as specified. Existing law, until January 1, 2018, authorizes a borrower to bring an action for injunctive relief to enjoin a material violation of certain of these provisions if a trustee's deed of sale has not been recorded. This bill would exempt a licensed title company or underwritten title company, except when it is acting as a trustee, from liability for a violation of those provisions if it records or causes to record a notice of default or notice of sale at the request of a trustee, substitute trustee, or beneficiary, in good faith and in the normal course of its business activities.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 15, 2013
Signed Sep 6, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 16, 2013 · Assembly Aug 22, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 16, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 6, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0)
assembly
Aug 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 13).
lower
Jul 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
lower
May 16, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 852.) (May 7).
upper
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 590.) (April 17).
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Mar 21, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 310
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 310. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline