SB 283 California Senate · 2013-2014 Regular Session

CalFresh eligibility.

Summary
Existing federal law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , known in California as CalFresh, formerly the Food Stamp Program, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Under existing law, a person convicted of specified drug offenses, including transporting, selling, furnishing, administering, giving away, possessing for sale, purchasing for purpose of sale, or manufacturing a controlled substance, is ineligible to receive CalFresh benefits. Existing law authorizes the payment of CalFresh benefits to other convicted drug felons who have participated in, or are on the waiting list for, a drug treatment program, or who can show other evidence that the illegal use of controlled substances has ceased. This bill would authorize CalFresh benefits to be paid to an individual who is convicted in state or federal court after December 31, 1997, of any offense classified as a felony that has as an element the possession, use, or distribution of a controlled substance, as defined. If the person is on supervised release, he or she would be ineligible for CalFresh benefits during any period of revocation of that supervised release where the revocation results in the individual's incarceration. The bill would authorize implementation and administration of these provisions by all-county letters or similar instructions from the Director of Social Services, developed in consultation with specified entities, and would, thereafter, require the State Department of Social Services to adopt regulations by January 1, 2015. Because counties administer CalFresh, this bill would increase county duties by potentially expanding the eligible population, and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2013 Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013

How they voted

257
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 36
May 30, 2013
D Democratic27
25 Yea 1 Nay 1
92% Yea
R Republican9
6 Nay 3
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 18, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-7-4)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1010.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 17, 2013
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 485.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Loni Hancock
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
CA
9