Workers' compensation.
Summary
Existing law establishes the 7-member Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, and provides that the members of the appeals board are appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. Existing law requires that 5 of the 7 members of the board be experienced attorneys admitted to practice in the State of California, and provides that the other 2 members need not be attorneys. This bill would require that all 7 members of the board be experienced attorneys admitted to practice in the State of California. Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires that medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and hospital treatment that is reasonably required to relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury be provided by the employer. Existing law prohibits a chiropractor from being a treating physician after the employee has received a certain number of chiropractic visits. This bill would correct an erroneous cross-reference with respect to these provisions. Existing law requires that a lien claimant is entitled to an order or award for reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee, together with interest at the rate allowed on civil judgments, if certain conditions are satisfied. This bill would specify that these fees are to be paid by the employer. Existing law requires an order or award for payment of a lien for medical or hospital treatment, as specified, to be made for payment only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses for medical or hospital treatment at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee unless the person has ceased doing business in the capacity held at the time the expenses were incurred and has assigned all right, title, and interest in the remaining accounts receivable to the assignee. This bill would authorize an assignment of that payment if the assignment was completed prior to January 1, 2013, or if it was required by a contract that became enforceable and irrevocable prior to January 1, 2013. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of existing law. Existing law authorizes an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation, including vocational rehabilitation services, within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability or that providing vocational rehabilitation services has become feasible because the employee's medical condition has improved or because of other factors not capable of determination at the time the employer's liability for vocational rehabilitation services otherwise terminated. This bill would delete the provisions relating to vocational rehabilitation, but retain the authority of an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 13, 2013
Vetoed Oct 13, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 16, 2013 · Assembly Sep 3, 2013
How they voted
24–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
May 16, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Feb 27, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 13, 2013
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 13, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 2164.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 3, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-22-2)
assembly
Sep 3, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 7, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (August 7).
lower
May 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
May 16, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9-1)
senate
May 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 882.) (May 8).
upper
May 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Mar 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 258
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 258. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline