Pupil assessment: grade 2 diagnostic assessments.
Summary
Existing law, the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act, requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to design and implement a statewide pupil assessment program that includes numerous elements, including, among other things, a plan for producing valid, reliable, and comparable individual pupil scores in grades 2 to 11, inclusive. The act also requires school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education to administer to each of its pupils in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, certain achievement tests, including a standards-based achievement test pursuant to the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program. Existing law makes all provisions of the act inoperative on July 1, 2014. Assembly Bill 484 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, if enacted, would, among other things, suspend the STAR Program achievement test for pupils in grade 2 commencing with the 2013–14 school year. This bill would require the State Department of Education, by November 1, 2014, to identify and make available to school districts information regarding existing assessments in language arts and mathematics aligned to the adopted common core academic content standards for pupils in grade 2 for diagnostic use by classroom teachers. The bill would require the savings realized from the elimination of the grade 2 standards-based achievement testing to be used by local educational agencies to administer the identified assessments. The bill would require the department to ensure that the selected grade 2 diagnostic assessments are valid for purposes of identifying particular knowledge or skills a pupil has or has not acquired, but the assessments would not be valid measures for purposes of pupil, personnel, or local educational agency accountability. This bill would become operative only if AB 484 of the 2013–14 Regular Session is also enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2014.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 12, 2013
Signed Oct 2, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2013 · Assembly Sep 9, 2013
How they voted
27–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 29, 2013
D
Democratic28
96% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 2, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 2284.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-16-3)
assembly
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 27, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 29, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-11-1)
senate
May 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1009.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 483.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 247
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 247. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline