Toll collection: alternative technologies.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District and all known entities planning to implement a toll facility, to develop and adopt functional specifications and standards for an automatic vehicle identification system, as specified, and generally requires any automatic vehicle identification system purchased or installed after January 1, 1991, to comply with those specifications and standards. Existing federal law, pursuant to the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, requires all toll facilities on federal-aid highways to implement technologies or business practices that provide for the interoperability of electronic toll collection programs no later than a specified date. This bill would authorize the Department of Transportation and local and regional transportation agencies with existing or planned toll facilities to conduct a pilot project that uses automated toll collection technologies as an alternative to the existing radio-frequency identification tolling technology, in order to identify opportunities to facilitate lower cost tolling infrastructure, lower related operating costs, and more rapid deployment of high-occupancy toll lane networks. The bill would allow the test of tolling technologies that may not meet the interoperability requirements in existing law. The bill would authorize pilot projects in that regard for a period of up to 4 years. The bill would require any vendor participating in a pilot project to cover all related costs incurred by the participating agency. The bill would require each participating agency to make a specified report within 4 years of commencement of the pilot project to the Governor and the Legislature.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 13, 2013
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
May 13, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Aug 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 24, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 13, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
May 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 568.) (April 16).
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 242
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 242. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline