Debt buying.
Summary
(1) Existing state and federal law regulate the practice of debt collection. Existing state law prohibits a debt collector from engaging in specified conduct, including the use of threats or causing a telephone to ring repeatedly to annoy the person called. Existing law prohibits a debt collector from obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a consumer debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make such affirmation. This bill would enact the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act, which would regulate the activities of a person or entity that has bought charged-off consumer debt, as defined, for collection purposes and the circumstances pursuant to which the person may bring suit. The bill would apply to consumer debt sold or resold on or after January 1, 2014. The bill would prohibit a debt buyer, as defined, from making any written statement in an attempt to collect a consumer debt unless the debt buyer possesses information that the debt buyer is the sole owner or is authorized to assert the rights of all owners of the specific debt at issue, the debt balance, as specified, and the name and address of the creditor at the time the debt was charged off, among other things. The bill would require the debt buyer to make certain documents available to the debtor, without charge, upon receipt of a request, within 15 days. The bill would require that a specified notice be included with the debt buyer's first written communication with the debtor. The bill would require all settlement agreements between a debt buyer and a debtor to be documented in open court or otherwise in writing and would require a debt buyer who receives a payment on a debt to provide a receipt or statement containing certain information. The bill would prohibit a debt buyer from initiating a suit to collect a debt if the statute of limitations on the cause of action has expired. The bill would prescribe penalties for each violation of the act and would provide that its provisions may not be waived. The bill would require a debt buyer bringing an action on consumer debt to include certain information in his or her complaint. The bill would prohibit an entry of judgment in favor of a plaintiff debt buyer unless business records authenticated through a sworn declaration and relating to the debt and ownership of it, among other things, are submitted by the debt buyer to the court, and would permit a court to dismiss a debt buyer's action to collect with prejudice if this information is not provided or if the debt buyer fails to appear or is not prepared on the date scheduled for trial. (2) Existing law establishes a process for the enforcement of money judgments and requires a levying officer to provide certain documents and information to a judgment debtor and to a designated employer in connection with wage garnishment. Existing law permits a process server also to serve an earnings withholding order on an employer and requires that the process server also serve certain documents at this time. Existing law requires an employer who is served with an earnings withholding order to provide certain documents to an employee who is a judgment debtor. This bill would require, in the circumstances described above, that a copy of the form that the judgment debtor may use to make a claim of exemption and a copy of the form used to provide a financial statement also be provided.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Jul 2013
Signed into Law
Jul 2013
Introduced Feb 11, 2013
Signed Jul 11, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 24, 2013 · Assembly Jul 1, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 24, 2013
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Jul 11, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 1, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-6)
assembly
Jun 25, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 24).
lower
Jun 18, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Jun 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & F.
lower
May 24, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
May 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 852.) (May 7).
upper
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 590.) (April 17).
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
Ben Hueso
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 233
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 233. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline