SB 202 California Senate · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Automotive repair.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the Automotive Repair Act, establishes the Bureau of Automotive Repair under the supervision and control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. A violation of the act is a crime. Existing law provides for the registration and regulation of automotive repair dealers and makes it unlawful for any person to be an automotive repair dealer unless registered with the bureau. Existing law defines an automotive repair dealer and an automotive technician as persons who, among other things, repair motor vehicles. Existing law defines the repair of motor vehicles to mean all maintenance of and repairs to motor vehicles, as specified, and excludes from the definition, among other things, repairing tires, changing tires, lubricating vehicles, installing light bulbs, batteries, windshield wiper blades, and other minor services. Existing law defines an automotive technician as an employee of an automotive repair dealer or that dealer, if the employer or dealer repairs motor vehicles, and who for salary or wage performs specified work on a motor vehicle, but excludes, among other things, repairing tires, changing tires, lubricating vehicles, installing light bulbs, batteries, windshield wiper blades, and other minor accessories. This bill would delete repairing and changing tires from those exclusion lists. The bill would additionally exclude tire services provided by or on behalf of a motor club holding a specified certificate of authority or an operator of a tow truck owned or operated by a person or entity possessing a valid motor carrier permit from the definitions of "repair of motor vehicles" and "automotive technician." Because the failure of a person repairing and changing tires to register as an automotive repair dealer with the bureau would constitute a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 7, 2013 Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2013

How they voted

33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 9, 2013
D Democratic26
24 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
17
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 20, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
May 9, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 617.) (April 22).
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 463.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Cathleen Galgiani
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
CA
5