Instructional materials: academic content standards: English learners.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to review existing tests that assess the English language development of pupils whose primary language is a language other than English, and requires that the tests include, but not be limited to, an assessment of the achievement of these pupils in English reading, speaking, and written skills, in accordance with specified criteria. Existing law requires each school district that has one or more pupils who are English learners, and, to the extent required by federal law, a county office of education and a charter school, to assess the English language development of each of those pupils in order to determine their level of proficiency. Existing law requires the State Department of Education, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to establish procedures for conducting the assessment and for the reclassification of a pupil from English learner to English proficient. Existing law requires a school district to annually conduct the assessment during a period that commences on the day upon which 55% of the instructional year is completed through July 1 of that calendar year. This bill would apply the above requirements to initial and summative assessments and make conforming changes. The bill would require the Superintendent to determine which assessments, if any, meet specified requirements, and would require the assessments to be used for certain purposes. The bill would require the state board to approve assessment blueprints, assessment performance descriptors, and performance-level cut scores based on standard settings. The bill would require the Superintendent to report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature when the assessments are ready for their initial administration. The bill would make the above-described provisions of existing law inoperative when the Superintendent makes this report, and would repeal those provisions the following January 1. The bill, after the Superintendent reports to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, would require the summative assessment to be conducted annually during a 4-month period after January 1 determined by the Superintendent with the approval of the state board and the assessment for initial identification to be conducted upon the initial enrollment of a pupil. (2) Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt basic instructional materials for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, for governing boards, as specified. Existing law also requires the state board to adopt and approve academic content standards for language arts and for English language development for pupils whose primary language is a language other than English. This bill would authorize the state board to adopt basic instructional materials for kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, that are aligned to those standards for language arts and English language development by no later than November 30, 2015. The bill would, among other things, require the State Department of Education, before conducting an adoption of basic instructional materials for language arts and English language development, to provide notice, as specified, to all publishers or manufacturers that each publisher or manufacturer is required to pay a fee, as specified, to offset the cost of conducting the adoption process.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 7, 2013
Signed Oct 2, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2013 · Assembly Sep 9, 2013
How they voted
30–9
Passed
Total votes 39
May 28, 2013
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Oct 2, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 2284.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-13-5)
assembly
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 21, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 28, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-9)
senate
May 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1008.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 404.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 201
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 201. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline