State highways: scenic highways.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the California Transportation Commission to adopt a location for a state highway alignment on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides that certain portions of authorized state highway routes are also within the state scenic highway system, subject to implementation through a corridor protection system designed to meet certain scenic highway standards. Existing law provides for the Department of Transportation to designate a particular state highway within the scenic highway system as an official state scenic highway upon determination by the department that a corridor protection program has been implemented, as specified. Existing law includes in the state scenic highway system the portion of State Highway Route 10 between Route 38 near Redlands and Route 62 near Whitewater in the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside. This bill would delete this portion of State Highway Route 10 from the state scenic highway system.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
Apr 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Feb 4, 2013
Signed Aug 27, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Apr 18, 2013 · Assembly Aug 12, 2013
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 34
Apr 18, 2013
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Aug 27, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 15, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 1. Page 1854.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-2-3)
assembly
Aug 12, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (July 1).
lower
May 9, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-3)
senate
Apr 15, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 391.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 169
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline