Public transit.
Summary
Existing law provides for creation of one or more special benefit districts within a transit district or rapid transit district relative to the issuance of bonds to be repaid through special assessments levied on property within the special benefit district, or certain zones within the special benefit district, with the proceeds of the bonds to be used for specified transit improvements. Existing law enacts similar provisions applicable to a municipal transit system owned by a city or city and county. This bill would repeal all of these provisions. Existing law, with respect to the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, authorizes the creation of one or more benefit districts by the authority for rail transit purposes. This bill, until January 1, 2021, would enact new general provisions similar to the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority provisions that would authorize an operator, defined to mean a transit district, municipal operator, or other public agency operating or contracting for the operation of transit, commuter rail, or intercity rail services, to create one or more special benefit districts within the service area of the operator relative to the issuance of bonds to be repaid through special assessments levied on property within the special benefit district, or zones within the special benefit district. An operator other than a transit district or municipal operator would be authorized to implement these provisions only if the action is consistent with the general or specific plans of the city or county within which the special benefit district is to be created. The proceeds of the bonds would be required to be used for eligible transit projects, including transit stations and rail facilities, as defined. The eligible transit projects would be required to provide special benefits to parcels of land, and improvements on those parcels, within the vicinity of transit stations. The bill would require the area included in a benefit district established under these provisions to lie not more than12 mile from the center point of a transit station. The bill would require the special benefit assessments authorized by the bill to be levied and collected by the applicable county and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Jan 30, 2013
Signed Oct 8, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2013 · Assembly Sep 9, 2013
How they voted
23–9
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 28, 2013
D
Democratic26
88% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 8, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 2282.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-24-1)
assembly
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 21).
lower
Aug 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (August 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and L. GOV.
lower
May 28, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9-3)
senate
May 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Apr 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 566.) (April 17).
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 142
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 142. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline