Food labeling: genetically engineered food.
Summary
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale, any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified state and federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor. This bill, beginning January 1, 2016, would require that any food, except as provided, offered for retail sale in the state be considered misbranded if it is entirely or partially genetically engineered, as defined, and that fact is not disclosed in a specified manner. The bill would prescribe labeling requirements for a raw agricultural commodity that is genetically engineered and packaged foods, as defined, containing some products of genetic engineering. The bill would impose these labeling requirements on manufacturers and retailers, as defined, of the commodities and foods. Because this bill would create new crimes by expanding the number of foods that could potentially be misbranded, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
May 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Last action May 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2014
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 29, 2014
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
9
May 29, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
May 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3715.) (May 23).
upper
May 5, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Apr 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 3235.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Apr 3, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 3, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and AGRI.
upper
Mar 27, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 2992.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 17, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH, AGRI., and JUD.
upper
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1381
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1381. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline