Telecommunications universal service programs.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The universal service principles include the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services, that are reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas. Existing law authorizes the Public Utilities Commission to supervise and regulate every public utility in the state, including telephone corporations, and to fix just and reasonable rates and charges for the public utility. Existing law establishes the state's 6 universal service funds in the State Treasury, including the California High-Cost Fund-A Administrative Committee Fund and the California High-Cost Fund-B Administrative Committee Fund, and provides that moneys in each of the state's universal service funds are the proceeds of rates and are held in trust for the benefit of ratepayers and to compensate telephone corporations for their costs of providing universal service. Moneys in the funds may only be expended to accomplish specified telecommunications universal service programs, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act or upon supplemental appropriation. Existing law, until January 1, 2015, requires the commission to develop, implement, and maintain a suitable program to establish a fair and equitable local rate structure aided by universal service rate support to small independent telephone corporations that serve rural areas and are subject to rate-of-return regulation by the commission (the CHCF-A program) . Existing law, until January 1, 2015, requires the commission to develop, implement, and maintain a suitable, competitively neutral, and broad-based program to establish a fair and equitable local rate support structure aided by universal service rate support to telephone corporations serving areas where the cost of providing services exceeds rates charged by providers, as determined by the commission (the CHCF-B program) . This bill would delete the provision stating that moneys in each of the state's universal service funds are the proceeds of rates and are held in trust for the benefit of ratepayers and to compensate telephone corporations for their cost of providing universal service and would instead provide that moneys in the funds are held in trust. The bill would encourage the commission, in administering the universal service program funds, and in administering state participation in federal universal service programs, to maximize the amount of federal funding to California participants in the federal programs. The bill would extend the repeal date of the CHCF-A program and CHCF-B program requirements until January 1, 2019. The bill would renumber the statute establishing the programmatic requirements for the CHCF-B program so that it is located in the code adjacent to the statute establishing the California High-Cost Fund-B Administrative Committee Fund, would delete outdated language, and would make other conforming changes. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order or direction of the commission is a crime. Because the CHCF-A program and CHCF-B program, that are extended under the provisions of this bill, are within the act and a decision or order of the commission implements the programs' requirements, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Signed Sep 20, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2014 · Assembly Aug 25, 2014
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 29, 2014
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 20, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4879.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 25, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-1)
assembly
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 14).
lower
Aug 6, 2014
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 1, 2014
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 23).
lower
Jun 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was reported from committee on June 25, 2014.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
May 29, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
May 27, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3715.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 1, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3079.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 17, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 15 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jean Fuller
RRepublican
Co
Alex Padilla
DDemocratic
Co
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
Beth Gaines
RRepublican
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
DL
Dan Logue
RRepublican
Co
HP
Henry Perea
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Co
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1364
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1364. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline