Payment cards.
Summary
Existing law generally provides for the regulation of credit and debit cards, including, but not limited to, limitations on the methods for offering and denying a credit card, requirements for listing the name appearing on a credit card, and restrictions on a person's liability for an unauthorized use of his or her credit or debit card. This bill would require retailers, starting April 1, 2016, except as specified, that accept a payment card, as defined, to provide a means of processing card-present payment card transactions involving payment cards equipped with embedded microchips or any other technology that is more secure than static magnetic stripe technology for card-present fraud prevention. The bill would also require specified contracts entered into between a financial institution and a payment card network, as those terms are defined, to include a provision requiring that 75% of new or replacement payment cards issued to a cardholder with a California mailing address have an embedded microchip or any other technology that is more secure than microchip technology for card-present fraud prevention. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations in this regard and would repeal these requirements on or before January 1, 2020, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2020, deletes or extends that date.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
1
May 28, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the measure be returned to the Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3717.) (May 27).
upper
May 27, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3575.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 23, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
May 12, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3403.) (May 6).
upper
Apr 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 22, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3162.) (April 9).
upper
Mar 26, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Mar 17, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1351
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1351. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline