Postsecondary education: California DREAM Loan Program.
Summary
Existing law establishes the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, and the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the regents and the trustees to require that mandatory systemwide fees and tuition, among other fees, be paid by students at campuses of the University of California and the California State University, respectively. This bill would establish the California DREAM Loan Program. The bill would provide that, commencing with the 2015–16 academic year, a student attending a participating campus of the University of California or California State University may receive a loan, referred to as a DREAM loan, through the program if the student satisfies specified requirements, including a requirement that the student be exempt from paying nonresident tuition or meet equivalent requirements adopted by the regents. The bill would require the Student Aid Commission, in collaboration with the participating campus, to certify that the student satisfies these requirements. The bill would require the student to affirm in writing that he or she satisfies one of these requirements, and would require the student to authorize the commission to access any information pertinent to certify that the student satisfies these requirements. The bill would require a participating campus to determine the amount of the loan offered to an individual student by the campus, subject to enumerated specifications. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that funds shall be appropriated in the annual Budget Act each fiscal year, commencing with the 2015–16 fiscal year, to participating campuses based upon the number of eligible students attending each respective campus who submitted a specified financial aid application during the prior academic year. The bill would require a participating campus to deposit these funds in a DREAM revolving fund established by each campus, subject to specified exceptions. The bill would require each participating campus to contribute its discretionary funds into its DREAM revolving fund so that the sum of the campus' contribution of funds and its share of DREAM loan repayments equals or exceeds 50%, as specified, of all funds in the campus' DREAM revolving fund at the start of each academic year before DREAM loans are awarded for that academic year. The bill would require the California State University and the University of California to annually report to the Legislature as part of their respective annual financial aid reports the dollar amount of each DREAM loan awarded and number of students for whom a DREAM loan was awarded that academic year, and require each participating campus to annually report the total amount of funding in the institution's DREAM revolving fund, the annual amount contributed by the state, and the annual amount contributed by the institution to the institution's DREAM revolving fund, and the annual administrative costs of the DREAM Program at the institution. The bill would require a participating campus to determine a student's eligibility for a DREAM loan, award DREAM loans to students, and establish mechanisms for recording the annual amount of the DREAM loan borrowed by each recipient, and the aggregate amount of DREAM loans borrowed by each recipient. The bill would require the trustees and request the regents to adopt regulations providing for the withholding of institutional services from current and former students who have been notified in writing that they are in default on DREAM loans. The bill would provide that each participating campus is entitled to an administrative cost allowance to equal a specified amount for an award year if the campus advances funds through the DREAM Program to students that academic year. The bill would provide that, if a state court finds that a specified provision of this program or similar provision adopted by the Regents of the University of California is unlawful, the court may order, as equitable relief, that the participating campus subject to the lawsuit terminate all loans awarded pursuant to that provision without money damages, loans, or other retroactive relief being awarded, and that the California State University and the University of California are immune from any imposition of money damages, loans, or other retroactive relief for actions taken under this program.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Signed Sep 28, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2014 · Assembly Aug 25, 2014
How they voted
24–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 29, 2014
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Sep 28, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 10. Page 4876.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 25, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-17-4)
assembly
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 14).
lower
Aug 6, 2014
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 24).
lower
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
May 29, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9-2)
senate
May 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3711.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 22, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3118.) (April 9).
upper
Apr 3, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Co
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1210
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1210. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline