Mental health: conservatorship hearings for the gravely disabled.
Summary
Existing law provides a procedure for the appointment of a conservator for a person who is determined to be gravely disabled as a result of a mental disorder or an impairment by chronic alcoholism and requires an officer, including a county public guardian or a county mental health program, to conduct a conservatorship investigation. Under existing law, a professional person in charge of an agency providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive treatment for a gravely disabled person may recommend a conservatorship for that person. Existing law requires the officer providing conservatorship investigation, when he or she concurs with the recommendation, to petition the superior court in the patient's county of residence for a conservatorship. This bill would instead require the officer providing conservatorship investigation to petition the superior court for a conservatorship for a gravely disabled person whenever the professional person in charge of an agency providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive treatment recommends conservatorship for a gravely disabled person. By expanding the duties of the county officer providing conservatorship investigation, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
2
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 6). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 987
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 987. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline