Postrelease community supervision: flash incarceration: city jails.
Summary
Existing law requires that persons released from prison be subject either to parole for a specified period of time or to postrelease community supervision for a period not exceeding 3 years. Existing law specifies the conditions of postrelease community supervision and permits each county agency responsible for postrelease supervision to determine an appropriate response to alleged violations, including flash incarceration in a county jail. Existing law provides for review of an alleged parole violation and likewise allows the supervising parole agency to impose additional conditions of supervision, including flash incarceration in a county jail. Existing law defines flash incarceration for these purposes as a period of detention in a county jail ranging from one to 10 days due to a violation of an offender's conditions of release. This bill would additionally permit flash incarceration in a city jail pursuant to the above provisions. The bill would make a conforming change. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 13, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2013 · Assembly Sep 12, 2013
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Sep 12, 2013
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Oct 13, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0)
assembly
Sep 12, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3301.).
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jun 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 7).
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 986
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 986. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline