Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: enforcement: penalties.
Summary
The California Coastal Act of 1976 requires a person undertaking development in the coastal zone to obtain a coastal development permit in accordance with prescribed procedures. Existing law authorizes the superior court to impose civil liability on a person who performs or undertakes development that is in violation of the act or that is inconsistent with a previously issued coastal development permit, and on a person who violates the act in any other manner. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2019, the California Coastal Commission to impose upon a person who violates the act an administrative civil penalty by a majority vote of the commissioners, upon consideration of various factors, and in an amount not to exceed 75% of the maximum civil penalty that may be imposed in the superior court, as specified. The bill would require the penalty to be assessed for each day the violation persists, but for no more than 5 years. This bill would prohibit a person, as defined, from being subject to both this monetary civil liability imposed by the commission and a monetary civil liability imposed by the superior court for the same act or failure to act. The bill, in the event that a person who is assessed a penalty by the commission fails to pay the penalty, fails to comply with a restoration or cease and desist order, or challenges any of these actions in a court of law, would authorize the commission to maintain an action or otherwise engage in judicial proceedings to enforce those requirements and would authorize the court to grant relief, as specified. This bill would also allow the commission to record a lien on the property of a violator in the amount of the penalty assessed by the commission if the violator fails to pay the penalty. The bill would prohibit the assessment of administrative penalties if the homeowner corrects the violations, as specified. The bill would specify that the repeal of the authority to impose a penalty would not terminate the authority of the commission to impose and collect an administrative penalty for a violation for which the commission commenced an enforcement proceeding on a date prior to the repeal date.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2013 · Assembly May 30, 2013
How they voted
20–14
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 6, 2013
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
13
Amendments
3
Sep 10, 2013
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. To Conference Committee. (Ayes 34. Noes 30. Page 3147.)
legislature
Sep 9, 2013
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 32. Page 3044.)
lower
Sep 6, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-14-1)
senate
Sep 6, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Jul 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and JUD.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (34-27-3)
assembly
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 976
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 976. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline