Patient transfer: nonmedical reasons: notice to contact person or next of kin.
Summary
Existing law establishes the State Department of Public Health and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, the licensing and regulation of health facilities, as defined. Existing law prohibits the transfer of a person needing emergency services from one hospital to another for any nonmedical reason unless prescribed conditions are met. A knowing and intentional violation of those provisions is a crime. This bill would, in addition, require that, prior to a transfer of a patient for a nonmedical reason, the hospital ask the patient if there is a preferred contact person to be notified, and make a reasonable attempt to contact that person and alert him or her about the proposed transfer, and, if the patient is not able to respond, require that the hospital make a reasonable effort to ascertain the identity of the preferred contact person or the next of kin and alert him or her about the transfer. The bill would require that the hospital document any attempts to contact a preferred contact person or next of kin in the patient's medical record. Because a knowing and intentional violation of these requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 10, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2013 · Assembly Aug 30, 2013
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 26, 2013
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 10, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0)
assembly
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2783.).
lower
Aug 26, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 26, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 26).
upper
May 23, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 974
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 974. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline