Grand theft.
Summary
Under existing law, every person who feloniously steals, takes, carries, leads, or drives away the personal property of another, or who fraudulently appropriates the property which has been entrusted to him or her, among other things, is guilty of theft. Under existing law, grand theft is generally theft committed when the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding $950, or when certain kinds of property are taken. Under existing law, grand theft is committed when the property taken is a horse, mare, gelding, any bovine animal, any caprine animal, mule, jack, jenny, sheep, lamb, hog, sow, boar, gilt, barrow, or pig, or if a person steals the carcass or portion of the carcass of any bovine, caprine, equine, ovine, or suine animal, or of any mule, jack, or jenny. Under existing law, grand theft is punishable either as a felony or a misdemeanor. This bill would make grand theft of the above-specified animals punishable as a felony or a misdemeanor, or by a fine not exceeding $5,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment. The bill would require the proceeds of the fine to be allocated to the Bureau of Livestock Identification to be used upon appropriation for specified purposes. The bill would make technical, nonsubstantive, and conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 7, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2013 · Assembly May 30, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 3, 2013
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 7, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2913.).
lower
Sep 4, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-2)
senate
Jul 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 25, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 924
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 924. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline