Voter registration and recall elections.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, if a county elections official receives an affidavit of voter registration that does not include all required information, and the elections official is not able to collect the missing information by telephone, but the mailing address of the affiant is legible, the elections official is required to inform the affiant of the reason for rejection of the affidavit and send to the affiant a new voter registration card. This bill would allow the elections official under these circumstances to send to the affiant any other document, as determined by the elections official, on which the affiant may provide the missing information. (2) Existing provisions of the California Constitution and statute authorize the recall of state officers. Each section of a recall petition is required to be filed with the elections official of the county in which it was circulated. Existing law requires the elections official to report to the Secretary of State, 30 days after a recall has been initiated and every 30 days thereafter, the number of signatures submitted on the recall petition sections, the number of valid signatures, and related information. Upon the submission of a section of a recall petition, if fewer than 500 signatures are submitted to the elections official, the elections official is required to count the number of signatures and submit those results to the Secretary of State. If 500 or more signatures are submitted to the elections official, the elections official may verify, using a random sampling technique, either 3% of the signatures submitted or 500 signatures, whichever is less, and report the results of that verification to the Secretary of State. This bill would instead provide that if 500 or more signatures are submitted to the elections official, the elections official may verify, using a random sampling technique, either 3% of the signatures submitted or 500 signatures, whichever is greater. By increasing the duties of local election officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Apr 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 26, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2014 · Assembly Aug 19, 2014
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 18, 2014
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 26, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-1)
assembly
Aug 19, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6182.).
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 18, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 19, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Jun 19, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 4, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 9, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 17).
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 882
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 882. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline