Local government retirement plans.
Summary
Existing law requires local legislative bodies, before authorizing changes in public retirement plan benefits or other postemployment benefits, to secure the services of an actuary to provide a statement of the actuarial impact of the changes. This bill would require, whenever a local ordinance or measure qualifies for the ballot that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement benefit plan of employees of a local government entity, whether by initiative or legislative action, the governing body of the local government entity to secure the services of an independent actuary to provide a statement, or a summary of the statement, not to exceed 500 words in length, of the actuarial impact of the proposed measure upon future annual costs of the retirement benefit plan, and to have this statement printed in the voter information portion of the sample ballot. The bill would require a specified notice regarding obtaining a copy of the measure to be printed in the voter information portion of the sample ballot, if the text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information portion of the sample ballot. The requirements of the bill would apply to a city, including a charter city; a county, including a charter county; a city and county, including a charter city and county; a community college district; or a special district. By imposing new requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2013 · Assembly May 23, 2013
How they voted
26–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
13
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 12, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 3112.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-9-1)
senate
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 20, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and GOV. & F.
upper
May 23, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-17-6)
assembly
May 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 15).
lower
May 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and E. & R.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 822
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 822. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline