Private arbitration companies: disclosures.
Summary
Existing law regulates arbitration conducted pursuant to an arbitration agreement, as specified. Existing law requires a private arbitration company involved in consumer arbitration cases to collect and make certain information regarding those cases available to the public in a computer-searchable format, accessible at the Internet Web site of the private arbitration company, if it has an Internet Web site, and on paper upon request. This bill would require a private arbitration company to collect additional information related to a consumer arbitration case, as specified, and to provide the information in a single cumulative report. The bill would require a private arbitration company to make the report available in a format that allows the public to search and sort the information using readily available software, and to make the report accessible on the private arbitration company's Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature that private arbitration companies comply with all legal obligations under these provisions, and also would provide that any amendments made by this act to the reporting requirements of a private arbitration company would not apply to consumer arbitrations administered by the private arbitration company before January 1, 2015.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Jan 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Signed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 29, 2014
How they voted
43–20
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 66
Jan 29, 2014
D
Democratic45
93% Yea
R
Republican21
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 56. Noes 21. Page 6210.).
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 16, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 3, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Feb 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 29, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-20-3)
assembly
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 802
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 802. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline