Court transcripts.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a superior court to appoint official reporters and prescribes the fees for their services. Existing law requires that transcripts prepared by a reporter using computer assistance and delivered on a medium other than paper be compensated at the same rate set for paper transcripts, except as specified. Existing law establishes certain fees for second copies of transcripts, as specified, including transcripts in computer-readable format. Existing law authorizes a court, party, or person who has purchased a transcript to reproduce a copy or portion thereof as an exhibit, pursuant to court order or rule, or for internal use, without paying a further fee to the reporter, but prohibits otherwise providing or selling a copy or copies to any other party or person. This bill would limit the reproduction provisions described above to computer-readable transcripts. This bill would additionally authorize, in the case of transcripts that are not computer-readable, the purchaser of a transcript to reproduce the transcript for internal use or in response to a request for discovery, a court order, or subpoena, or as permitted by rule of court or statute, without paying a further fee to the reporter, but would prohibit otherwise providing or selling a copy or copies to any other party or person.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2013
How they voted
48–10
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 69
May 31, 2013
D
Democratic48
58% Yea
R
Republican21
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Jun 24, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 31, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-10-11)
assembly
Apr 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 16).
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 788
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 788. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline