Local public employee organizations: dispute: factfinding panel.
Summary
Existing law requires the governing body of a local public agency, or those boards, commissions, administrative officers, or other representatives as may be properly designated by law or by a governing body, to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organizations. Existing law authorizes an employee organization to request that the parties' differences be submitted to a factfinding panel not sooner that 30 days or more than 45 days following the appointment or selection of a mediator pursuant to the parties' agreement to mediate or a mediation process required by a public agency's local rules. Existing law authorizes an employee organization, if the dispute was not submitted to mediation, to request that the parties' differences be submitted to a factfinding panel not later than 30 days following the date that either party provided the other with a written notice of a declaration of impasse. This bill would require that request to be in writing. The bill would provide that if either party disputes that a genuine impasse, as defined, has been reached, the issue of whether an impasse exists may be submitted to the Public Employment Relations Board for resolution before the dispute is submitted to a factfinding panel, as specified. The bill would also authorize each party to select a person to serve as its member of the factfinding panel.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
0
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Feb 3, 2014
Assembly · Failed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Jan 31, 2014
Assembly · Failed
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
Jan 23, 2014
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Held under submission.
Jan 23, 2014
Assembly · Referred to committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
Jan 15, 2014
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Jan 6, 2014
Assembly · Referred to committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 6). Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
Jan 6, 2014
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
Jan 6, 2014
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
Jan 6, 2014
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
Mar 20, 2013
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
Mar 19, 2013
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
Mar 19, 2013
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
Feb 22, 2013
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 778
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 778. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline