Sentencing.
Summary
Existing law, operative January 1, 2014, provides that when a judgment of imprisonment is to be imposed and the statute specifies 3 possible terms, the court shall order imposition of the middle term, unless there are circumstances in aggravation or mitigation of the crime. Existing law, operative January 1, 2014, provides that the court shall state the reasons for its sentence choice on the record at the time of sentencing. This bill would additionally provide that the court may not impose an upper term based on aggravating facts unless the facts were first presented to the factfinder and the factfinder found the facts to be true. The bill would require the court to include, at the time it makes its on the record statement of the reasons for its sentence choice, the specific facts in aggravation, if any, it relied upon in imposing an upper term. The bill would state findings and declarations of the Legislature in connection with imposing upper term sentences.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 765
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 765. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline