AB 729 California Assembly · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Evidentiary privileges: union agent-represented worker privilege.

Summary
Existing law governs the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings and generally provides a privilege as to communications made in the course of certain relations, including the attorney-client, physician-patient, and psychotherapist-patient relationship, as specified. Under existing law, the right of any person to claim those evidentiary privileges is waived with respect to a communication protected by the privilege if any holder of the privilege, without coercion, has disclosed a significant part of the communication or has consented to a disclosure made by anyone. This bill would provide that a union agent, as defined, and a represented employee or represented former employee have a privilege to refuse to disclose any confidential communication between the employee or former employee and the union agent while the union agent was acting in his or her representative capacity, except as specified. The bill would provide that a represented employee or represented former employee also has a privilege to prevent another person from disclosing a privileged communication, except as specified. The bill would further provide that this privilege may be waived in accordance with existing law and does not apply in criminal proceedings. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 912 of the Evidence Code made by this bill and AB 267, to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2013 Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2013 · Assembly May 28, 2013

How they voted

219
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Sep 3, 2013
D Democratic25
21 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican10
9 Nay 1
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 2923.).
lower
Sep 4, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-5)
senate
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 10, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 28, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-23-3)
assembly
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 30).
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
CA
48