Hunting: nonlead ammunition.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Fish and Game Commission, by July 1, 2008, to establish by regulation a public process to certify centerfire rifle and pistol ammunition as nonlead ammunition, and to define by regulation nonlead ammunition as including only centerfire rifle and pistol ammunition in which there is no lead content. Existing law requires the commission to establish and annually update a list of certified centerfire rifle and pistol ammunition. Existing law requires that nonlead centerfire rifle and pistol ammunition, as determined by the commission, be used when taking big game with a rifle or pistol, as defined by the Department of Fish and Wildlife's hunting regulations, and when taking coyote, within specified deer hunting zones, but excluding specific counties and areas. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law requires the commission to establish a process, to the extent that funding is available, that will provide hunters in these specified deer hunting zones with nonlead ammunition at no or reduced charge. This bill would instead require, as soon as is practicable, but by no later than July 1, 2019, the use of nonlead ammunition for the taking of all wildlife, including game mammals, game birds, nongame birds, and nongame mammals, with any firearm. The bill would require the commission to certify, by regulation, nonlead ammunition for these purposes. The bill would require that the list of certified ammunition include any federally approved nontoxic shotgun ammunition. The bill would make conforming changes. The bill would provide that these provisions do not apply to government officials or their agents when carrying out a statutory duty required by law. The bill would require the commission to promulgate regulations by July 1, 2015, that phase in the requirements of these provisions. The bill would require that these requirements be fully implemented statewide by no later than July 1, 2019. The bill would require the commission to implement any of these requirements that can be implemented practicably, in whole or in part, in advance of July 1, 2019. The bill would also require that the commission not reduce or eliminate any existing regulatory restrictions on the use of lead ammunition in California condor range, as described, unless or until the additional requirements for use of nonlead ammunition as required by these provisions are implemented. By expanding and changing the definition of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing federal law restricts the importing, manufacturing, or sale of armor-piercing ammunition, as specified. This bill would temporarily suspend the required use of nonlead ammunition for a specific hunting season and caliber upon a finding by the Director of Fish and Wildlife that nonlead ammunition of a specific caliber is not commercially available from any manufacturer because of federal prohibitions relating to armor-piercing ammunition. The bill would require, notwithstanding a suspension, that nonlead ammunition be used when taking big game mammals, nongame birds, or nongame mammals in the California condor range. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Signed Oct 11, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly May 16, 2013
How they voted
21–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 10, 2013
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-13-1)
senate
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 44. Noes 29. Page 3109.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 11).
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 16, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-18-10)
assembly
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (April 16).
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 711
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 711. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline