Electricity.
Summary
The Public Utilities Act requires the Public Utilities Commission, pursuant to electrical restructuring, to authorize and facilitate direct transactions between electricity suppliers and retail end-use customers. Statutes enacted during the energy crisis of 2000–01, authorized the Department of Water Resources, until January 1, 2003, to enter into contracts for the purchase of electricity, and to sell electricity to retail end-use customers at not more than the department's acquisition costs and to recover those costs through the issuance of bonds to be repaid by ratepayers. That law suspended the right of retail end-use customers, other than community choice aggregators and a qualifying direct transaction customer, as defined, to acquire service through a direct transaction until the Department of Water Resources no longer supplies electricity under that law. Existing law continues the suspension of direct transactions except as expressly authorized, until the Legislature, by statute, repeals the suspension or otherwise authorizes direct transactions. Existing law requires the commission to authorize direct transactions for nonresidential end-use customers subject to a reopening schedule that will phase in over a period of not less than 3 years and not more than 5 years, and is subject to an annual maximum allowable total kilowatthour limit established, as specified, for each electrical corporation. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. This bill would additionally require the commission, when authorizing additional direct transactions for retail nonresidential end-use customers, to provide the highest priority to acquire electric services from other providers to entities treating and remediating groundwater that a federal, state, or local agency identifies as contaminated if the entity is a public drinking water system serving a disadvantaged or severely disadvantaged community. The bill would require the entity treating and remediating contaminated groundwater to use moneys saved as a result of the direct transaction for activities related to the treatment and remediation of the groundwater. Because a violation of this requirement is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would correct a statutory reference to a reporting requirement of the commission. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
39–20
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 64
May 29, 2013
D
Democratic43
90% Yea
R
Republican21
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Feb 4, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and E.Q.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-20-5)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 24).
lower
May 24, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (April 8).
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 687
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 687. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline