Local government: fines and penalties: assessments.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to make any violation of any ordinance enacted by the local agency subject to an administrative fine or penalty, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2020, authorize a city, county, city and county, or special district to, after notice and public hearing, specially assess any fines or penalties not paid after demand by the city, county, city and county, or special district against real property owned by the person owing those fines or penalties, where the fines or penalties are related to ordinance violations on the real property upon which the fines or penalties would be specially assessed, and the ordinance violations constitute a threat to public health and safety. This bill would require a city, county, city and county, or special district to comply with certain notice requirements. The bill would provide that the assessment may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as are provided for ordinary county taxes, and would authorize the city, county, city and county, or special district to record a lien against the property. This bill would authorize a local agency to appoint a hearing officer to hear and decide issues regarding ordinance violations and the imposition of administrative fines and penalties. This bill would, until January 1, 2020, provide that the powers given to the legislative body of a city, county, city and county, or special district under these provisions are in addition to any other powers of a city, county, city and county, or special district under its charter or any other legal authority.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2013 · Assembly May 9, 2013
How they voted
21–10
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Sep 3, 2013
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 5, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 56. Noes 22. Page 2911.).
lower
Sep 4, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-10-4)
senate
Jul 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 5, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 28, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 23, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-18-3)
assembly
Apr 4, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 683
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 683. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline