Automated traffic enforcement systems: violations.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a governmental agency to equip the limit line, intersection, or other places where a driver is required to stop with an automated traffic enforcement system if the system meets certain requirements, and provides a procedure for criminal adjudication of alleged violations recorded by that system. Existing law establishes that specified convictions and violations under the Vehicle Code and traffic-related incidents count as points against a driver's record for purposes of the suspension or revocation of the privilege to drive and that certain other violations do not result in a violation point. This bill would instead require violations recorded by an automated traffic enforcement system to be cited as civil violations, subject to a civil penalty, administrative process, and appeal in superior court. The bill would exempt certain of those civil violations from the violation point count process. This bill would also provide that if payment of an automated violation penalty is not received as specified on the notice of automated violation, the issuing agency may assess a delinquent fee and must serve a notice of delinquent automated violation. (2) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to refuse to renew the registration of a vehicle if, among other things, the registered owner or lessee has been mailed a notice of delinquent parking or a notice of toll evasion violation, unless the full amount of all outstanding penalties and administrative fees are paid to the department at the time of application for renewal, except as provided. This bill would similarly require the Department of Motor Vehicles to refuse to renew the registration of a vehicle if the registered owner or lessee has been mailed a notice of automated violation, as specified, unless the full amount of all outstanding automated violation penalties and administrative fees are paid to the department, except as provided. The bill would require the department to include on each vehicle renewal notice, or on an accompanying document, an itemization of unpaid automated penalties, the jurisdiction that issued the notice of automated violation, and the date of the automated violation. The bill would require the department to remit all automated violation penalties and administrative fees collected, except certain fees to cover its costs, to each jurisdiction, as specified.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 23, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and TRANS.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 666
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 666. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline