Electronic monitoring: removing or disabling.
Summary
Existing law permits, and with respect to certain sex offenders requires, the use of electronic monitoring by county probation departments and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to electronically monitor the whereabouts of persons on postrelease community supervision and parole, respectively. Under existing law, a person on postrelease community supervision parole, or mandatory supervision who fails to comply with the rules or conditions for the use of electronic monitoring as a supervision tool may be found to have violated the terms of his or her postrelease community supervision parole, or mandatory supervision, respectively, and may be required to serve a term of imprisonment in the county jail. This bill would provide that unauthorized removal, as specified, of an electronic, global positioning system (GPS) , or other monitoring device affixed as a condition of postrelease community supervision parole, or mandatory supervision is an offense punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or in the state prison for 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years. This bill would also provide that a person on postrelease community supervision parole, or mandatory supervision who is ordered pursuant to a revocation hearing to serve a term of imprisonment, incarceration, or confinement for violating the conditions of release, when the violation was based on the removal or disabling of an electronic, GPS, or other monitoring device affixed as a condition of release, and the person has not been prosecuted for that conduct, shall serve that term in the state prison. This bill would also make related, conforming changes. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 7, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Jan 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
May 7, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Reconsideration granted.
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 18, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 8, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.
lower
1 primary · 12 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Co
Beth Gaines
RRepublican
Co
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Co
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
DL
Diane L Harkey
RRepublican
Co
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Co
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Co
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 63
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 63. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline