Criminal procedure: testimony of law enforcement officers.
Summary
Existing law, as amended by Proposition 115, approved by the voters at the June 5, 1990, statewide primary election, authorizes a finding of probable cause to be based in whole or in part upon the sworn testimony of a law enforcement officer or honorably retired law enforcement officer relating the statements of declarants made out of court offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Under existing law that officer is required to have 5 years law enforcement experience or completed specified training. Existing law provides for amendment of these provisions by a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature. This bill would define a law enforcement officer, for purposes of these provisions, as any officer or agent employed by a federal, state, or local government agency who, in addition to that experience or training, has primary responsibility of the enforcement of any law, the detection and apprehension of persons who have violated any law, or the investigation and preparation for prosecution of cases involving violation of laws.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Jul 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Signed Aug 19, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Jul 8, 2013 · Assembly May 20, 2013
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Jul 8, 2013
D
Democratic26
84% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 19, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 8, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Jun 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11).
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 20, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-3)
assembly
May 8, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 7).
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Al Muratsuchi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 568
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 568. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline