Community redevelopment: successor agencies.
Summary
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all assets of the former redevelopment agency, and to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities. Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board to approve certain actions of the successor agency, including the approval of an enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to review the actions of an oversight board. Existing law prescribes when an action of an oversight board shall become effective, subject to approval by the Department of Finance. Existing law provides that certain loan agreements entered into between a redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency are deemed enforceable obligations. Existing law provides that bond proceeds derived from bonds issued by a redevelopment agency on or before December 31, 2012, are to be used for the purposes for which the bonds are sold. Existing law provides that enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation, as specified. Existing law provides that an expenditure made pursuant to these provisions constitutes the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify the enforceable obligations described above following the effective date of the approval of those enforceable obligations after review by the oversight board and the department. Existing law establishes a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agency's real properties. Existing law requires the successor agency to prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law provides for the transfer of property, and the liquidation of property and the use of proceeds, in a specified manner. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify a transfer of property, or the liquidation of property and the use of proceeds, as described above, if the transfer, liquidation, or use of proceeds is consistent with the approved plan of the successor agency. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 34191.4 and 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code, proposed by AB 662, that would become operative only if this bill and AB 662 are chaptered and become effective January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly May 30, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 10, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 13, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3208.).
lower
Sep 10, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-2)
senate
Sep 10, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 26, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 15, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Mar 13, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 12, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 564
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 564. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline