Sentencing: recall and mandatory supervision.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a court to recall a sentence of imprisonment in the state prison and to resentence a defendant in the same manner as if he or she had not previously been sentenced, upon the court's own motion or the recommendation of the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or the Board of Parole Hearings. Existing law prohibits the new sentence from being greater than the initial sentence and requires that credit be given to time served. This bill would similarly authorize the court to recall a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail for a felony, upon the court's own motion or the recommendation of the sheriff who administers the county jail facility, as specified. Existing law authorizes a court, when sentencing a person to county jail for a felony, to commit the person to county jail for either the full term in custody, as specified, or to suspend the execution of a concluding portion of the term selected at the court's discretion. Under existing law, this period of suspended execution is supervised by the county probation officer and is known as mandatory supervision. This bill would instead require the court to suspend execution of the concluding portion of the term in county jail for at least six months, during which time the person would be subject to mandatory supervision. By increasing the duties of county probation officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
2
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
May 1, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 560
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 560. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline