California Environmental Quality Act: translation.
Summary
Existing law, the California Environmental Quality Act, referred to as CEQA, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires a lead agency to provide and post specified notices. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to prepare and develop guidelines for the implementation of CEQA and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt those guidelines. This bill would require the office, on or before July 1, 2016, to prepare and develop recommended amendments to the guidelines and the secretary, on or before January 1, 2017, to certify and adopt those amendments to the guidelines to establish criteria for a lead agency to assess the need for translating those notices into non-English languages, as specified. By requiring a lead agency to consider the criteria for translating those notices, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Vetoed Sep 25, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2014 · Assembly May 31, 2013
How they voted
27–3
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Aug 21, 2014
D
Democratic26
80% Yea
R
Republican10
60% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
14
Committee
17
Amendments
4
Sep 25, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 56. Noes 23. Page 6400.).
lower
Aug 21, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-3-6)
senate
Aug 21, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 23 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
May 19, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 31, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-21-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) .
lower
May 24, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 7, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 23, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 543
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 543. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline