Telephonic sellers: loan modifications.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation of telephonic sellers, and requires that a telephonic seller register with the Department of Justice and file specified information with the department, as specified. Existing law defines "telephonic seller" to include, among others, a person who represents or implies in a telephonic solicitation, whether or not initiated by the telephonic seller, that he or she is offering to make a loan, or to arrange or assist in arranging a loan or to assist in providing information that may lead to the obtaining of a loan, with a specified exception. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to solicit prospects on behalf of a telephonic seller who is not registered with the department. This bill would include in the definition of telephonic sellers a person who represents or implies in a telephonic solicitation, whether initiated by the telephonic seller or made in response to inquiries generated by advertisements on behalf of the telephonic seller, that he or she is offering to arrange or assist in arranging the modification of an existing loan, or to assist in providing information that may lead to the obtaining of a loan modification, as specified. The bill would require these telephonic sellers to file certain information with the department, including the names and addresses of all persons who, in the previous 24 months, obtained loan modifications for individuals who responded to the seller's solicitations or representations. Because the bill would expand the scope of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jul 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 16, 2013
How they voted
62–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 69
May 16, 2013
D
Democratic48
93% Yea
R
Republican21
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 27, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & F.I. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Jun 18, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and B. & F.I.
upper
Jun 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.
upper
May 16, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-7)
assembly
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 20, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 469
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 469. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline