Hazardous materials: releases: local agency cleanup.
Summary
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, including, but not limited to, any obligations under the Polanco Redevelopment Act to remedy or remove the release of hazardous substances within a project area consistent with state and federal laws, as specified. Existing law, the Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act, imposes liability for hazardous substance removal or remedial actions and requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt, by regulation, criteria for the selection and for the priority ranking of hazardous substance release sites for removal or remedial action under the act. This bill would authorize a local agency to take any action similar to that under the Polanco Redevelopment Act that the local agency determines is necessary, consistent with other state and federal laws, to investigate and clean up a release of hazardous materials in a blighted area, as determined by the local agency, within the boundaries of the local agency, pursuant to the procedures specified in the bill. The bill would require a local agency to submit for approval a cleanup plan to the California regional water control board or to the Department of Toxic Substances Control before taking action. The bill would require a local agency to take specified actions with regard to providing an opportunity for the public and other public agencies to participate in decisions regarding the proposed cleanup plan. The bill would allow the local agency to take those cleanup activities only under specified conditions with regard to the responsible party for the release, unless the local agency is taking action to investigate or conduct feasibility studies concerning a release or determines that conditions require immediate action. The bill would allow the local agency to designate another agency, in lieu of the department or the regional board, to review and approve a cleanup plan and to oversee the cleanup of hazardous material from a hazardous material release site, under certain conditions. The bill would immunize a local agency that cleans up a hazardous material release, pursuant to those provisions, from liability under specified state laws, if the action is in accordance with a cleanup plan prepared by a qualified independent contractor, as defined, and approved by the department, a regional board, or the designated agency, and the cleanup is undertaken and properly completed. The bill would authorize the recovery by a local agency of cleanup costs from the responsible party.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 15, 2013
Signed Oct 5, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2013 · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 13, 2013
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
12
Committee
14
Amendments
1
Oct 5, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 70. Noes 1. Page 3359.).
lower
Sep 12, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the measure be returned with further amendments to the Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (September 12).
upper
Sep 10, 2013
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (September 10). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Sep 10, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-1-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 24).
lower
May 15, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and L. GOV.
lower
Feb 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 440
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 440. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline