Transportation: design-build: highways.
Summary
Existing law, until January 1, 2014, authorizes certain state and local transportation entities, if authorized by the California Transportation Commission, to use a design‑build process for contracts on transportation projects, as specified. Existing law establishes a procedure for submitting bids that includes a requirement that design-build entities provide a statement of qualifications submitted to the transportation entity that is verified under oath, subject to penalty of perjury. This bill would authorize the Department of Transportation to utilize design-build procurement for up to 10 projects on the state highway system, based on either best value or lowest responsible bid. The bill would authorize regional transportation agencies, as defined, to utilize design-build procurement for projects on or adjacent to the state highway system. The bill would also authorize those regional transportation agencies to utilize design-build procurement for projects on expressways that are not on the state highway system, as specified. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2024, or one year from the date that the Department of Transportation posts on its Internet Web site that the provisions related to the construction inspection services of these projects are invalid. The bill would provide that these design-build authorizations do not include construction inspection services for projects on or interfacing with the state highway system. The bill would require the Department of Transportation to perform construction inspection services for projects on or interfacing with the state highway system, as specified. The bill would require a transportation entity, as defined, awarding a contract for a public works project pursuant to these provisions, to reimburse the Department of Industrial Relations for costs of performing prevailing wage monitoring and enforcement of the public works project and would require moneys collected to be deposited into the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. By depositing money in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would extend the use of design-build procurement to regional transportation agencies, as defined, and extend the period of time for which the Department of Transportation may use design-build procurement, subject to existing procedures. The bill would, by extension, impose the statement of qualifications requirement upon regional transportation agencies and the department, subject to penalty of perjury, thereby creating a new crime and imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 15, 2013
Signed Oct 5, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly May 24, 2013
How they voted
29–2
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Sep 10, 2013
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
42
Key actions
14
Committee
17
Amendments
5
Oct 5, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 8. Page 3292.).
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (September 11).
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 10, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-2-4)
senate
Sep 10, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 26, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 21, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (August 20).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jul 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 24, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (53-3-7)
assembly
May 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 15).
lower
May 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 23, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 4, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on A. & A.R. and TRANS.
lower
Feb 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Co
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Co
Ken Cooley
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 401
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 401. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline