State government: federal immigration policy enforcement.
Summary
Existing federal law authorizes any authorized immigration officer to issue an immigration detainer that serves to advise another law enforcement agency that the federal department seeks custody of an alien presently in the custody of that agency, for the purpose of arresting and removing the alien. Existing federal law provides that the detainer is a request that the agency advise the department, prior to release of the alien, in order for the department to arrange to assume custody in situations when gaining immediate physical custody is either impracticable or impossible. This bill would prohibit a law enforcement official, as defined, from detaining an individual on the basis of a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement hold after that individual becomes eligible for release from custody, unless, at the time that the individual becomes eligible for release from custody, certain conditions are met, including, among other things, that the individual has been convicted of specified crimes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2012
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Dec 3, 2012
Signed Oct 5, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly May 16, 2013
How they voted
23–9
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Sep 10, 2013
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 5, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9-3)
senate
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 48. Noes 25. Page 3086.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 16, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-20-9)
assembly
Apr 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 9).
lower
Jan 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 4, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
VM
V. Manuel Pérez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 4
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 4. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline