AB 397 California Assembly · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Vehicles: emergency contact locator database.

Summary
(1) Existing law imposes specified requirements on manufacturers of motor vehicles sold or leased in this state. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would enact the California Motor Vehicle Emergency Contact Locator Act of 2013 and would define the term "VIN# ECON database" as the national law enforcement vehicle identification number emergency contact locator database that may be established by this state, in conjunction with other states and law enforcement agencies. This bill would require a motor vehicle manufacturer of a new motor vehicle sold or leased in this state on or after January 2, 2014, with a 2014 model year or later to provide a means by which a purchaser or lessee of a new motor vehicle can voluntarily designate at the original retail point of sale an emergency contact to be stored in the VIN# ECON database. The bill would require the emergency contact information to be made available electronically only to authorized law enforcement and would require law enforcement personnel, when practicable, to expeditiously notify the registered owner's emergency contact, if a vehicle occupant is rendered unable to communicate due to physical injury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies. The bill would also require a manufacturer of a new motor vehicle sold or leased in this state to establish a public awareness campaign, including listing access to the VIN# ECON database as a standard equipment specification on the new vehicle original window sticker. Since a violation of the bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2013 Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors