State mandates: prorated claims.
Summary
The California Constitution, whenever the Legislature or a state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, including school districts, requires a subvention of funds to reimburse the local government, with specified exceptions. Existing law requires the Controller to prorate claims if the amount appropriated for reimbursement is not sufficient to pay all of the claims approved by the Controller. Existing law requires the Controller to report to the Department of Finance and various legislative entities when it is necessary to prorate claims. This bill would delete that reporting requirement and would require the Controller to determine the most cost-effective allocation method if $1,000 or less is appropriated for a program. This bill would also make a conforming statutory change.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jul 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Jul 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Feb 15, 2013
Signed Aug 12, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Jul 1, 2013 · Assembly Jul 3, 2013
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Jul 1, 2013
D
Democratic26
88% Yea
R
Republican9
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 12, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 3, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-4)
assembly
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2286.).
lower
Jul 1, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Jul 1, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 23, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 392
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 392. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline