Vehicle rental agreements: customer facility charge.
Summary
Existing law governs contracts between rental car companies and their customers. Existing law authorizes a company that rents passenger vehicles to the public to collect a customer facility charge, which means a fee that is required by an airport to be collected to finance, design, and construct airport car rental facilities, transportation systems, and terminal modifications, if specified circumstances apply. Existing law requires the aggregate amount collected from customer facility charges not exceed the reasonable costs, determined based on an independent audit, to finance, design, and construct those facilities. Existing law requires the audit to be conducted prior to the collection of the customer facility charge, prior to any increase of the charge, and every 3 years after the initial collection of the charge. This bill would provide guidelines regarding the scope of the audit, would require the audit to be posted on the airport's Internet Web site and to be reported to specified legislative committees, and would limit the requirement to conduct the audit every 3 years to those instances where the customer facility charge is used to either operate a common-use transportation system or acquire vehicles for that system.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 14, 2013
Signed Oct 4, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2013 · Assembly May 24, 2013
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Sep 9, 2013
D
Democratic27
96% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Oct 4, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3076.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 24, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-9)
assembly
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 7).
lower
Apr 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 359
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 359. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline