AB 304 California Assembly · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Pesticides: toxic air contaminant: control measures.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Director of Pesticide Regulation, upon completion of an evaluation of a pesticide, to prepare a report on the health effects of any pesticide determined to be a toxic air contaminant that poses a present or potential hazard to human health due to airborne emission from its use, as specified. Existing law requires this report to be made available to the public, as specified. Existing law also requires the director to determine, in consultation with specified agencies, the need for and appropriate degree of control measures for each pesticide listed as a toxic air contaminant. Existing law defines toxic air contaminant to include those pesticides that have been identified as hazardous air pollutants pursuant to federal law. This bill would require the director's written determination regarding control measures for each pesticide and any formal written comments made by consulting agencies be made available to the public. The bill, for each pesticide for which a risk assessment has been completed that has been identified by the director as a toxic air contaminant based on its listing as a federally identified hazardous air pollutant, would require the director, in consultation with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the State Air Resources Board, and the air pollution control or air quality management districts in the affected counties, to determine the need for and appropriate degree of control measures, as specified. The bill would require the director's written determination and any formal written comments made by consulting agencies in regard to control measures for these pesticides to be made available to the public. (2) Existing law requires, for those pesticides for which a need for control measures has been determined, the director, in consultation with specified agencies, to develop control measures designed to reduce emissions sufficiently so the source will not expose the public to the levels of exposure that may cause or contribute to significant adverse health effects. Existing law requires, after a public hearing, the director to adopt, by regulation, control measures, including application of the best practicable control techniques for those pesticides for which a need has been determined. This bill would require the director to follow specified consultation procedures and would require the director, within 2 years of the determination of the need for control measures, as specified, to adopt control measures to protect human health. The bill, if the director is unable to adopt control measures to protect human health within 2 years of the determination of the need for control measures, would require the director to submit a specified report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature setting forth the reasons that requirement has not been met and to update that report, as specified. The bill would require, with respect to any pesticide for which a determination of the need for control measures was made before January 1, 2014, that the 2-year period described above commence on January 1, 2014. (3) This bill also would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 12, 2013 Signed Oct 5, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2013 · Assembly May 30, 2013

How they voted

340
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 9, 2013
D Democratic25
25 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
9 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Oct 5, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3075.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 26, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-1)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 8, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 13, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
CA
37