Trusts.
Summary
Existing law generally requires a trustee to allocate money received from an entity to income. However, existing law requires a trustee to allocate to principal money received from an entity that is a regulated investment company or a real estate investment trust if the money distributed is a capitol gain dividend for federal income taxes. Existing law also requires an allocation to principal of money received in total or partial liquidation of an entity. Existing law provides that money is to be treated as received in partial liquidation to the extent the amount received from the distributing entity is attributable to the proceeds from a sale by the distributing entity, or by the distributing entity's subsidiary or affiliate, of a capital asset, as defined. This bill would provide that an allocation to principal of money received in total or partial liquidation of an entity does not include a net short-term capital gain distribution from a regulated investment company or a real estate investment trust. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Jun 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 11, 2013
Signed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2014 · Assembly May 20, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 36
Jun 30, 2014
D
Democratic26
88% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6094.).
lower
Aug 12, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 12).
lower
Jul 3, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jun 30, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-3)
senate
Jun 30, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 15, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 20, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-5)
assembly
May 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 7).
lower
May 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on V.A. and JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and V.A.
lower
Feb 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 296
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 296. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline