Foster care: transition jurisdiction.
Summary
Existing law establishes transition jurisdiction for the juvenile court, and generally provides that minors who are wards in foster care placement, and certain nonminors who are eligible for aid, and who satisfy other specified criteria, including that their rehabilitative goals have been met and juvenile court jurisdiction over them as a ward is no longer required, are within the transition jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Existing law provides that a nonminor who was subject to an order for foster care placement at the time he or she attained 18 years of age and who has not attained 21 years of age, for whom the court has dismissed transition jurisdiction, dependency jurisdiction, or delinquency jurisdiction, but has retained general jurisdiction, may petition the court for a hearing to resume dependency jurisdiction over a former dependent or assume or resume transition jurisdiction over a former delinquent ward. This bill would authorize a court to assume or resume transition jurisdiction over a nonminor who attained 18 years of age while subject to an order for foster care placement without consideration of whether the rehabilitative goals of the nonminor, as set forth in the case plan in place at the time the court dismissed delinquency jurisdiction, have been met. By increasing the duties of local entities related to, and as a result of, the juvenile court assuming or resuming transition jurisdiction, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2014
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 77
May 23, 2014
D
Democratic55
94% Yea
R
Republican22
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 18, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 23, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-6)
assembly
May 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 13, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2573
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2573. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline