Ballot processing.
Summary
Existing law requires an elections official to compare the signature on the envelope of a vote by mail ballot, a mail ballot precinct ballot, or a provisional ballot with the signature that appears on the voter's affidavit of registration, as specified. If the elections official determines that the signatures do not compare, existing law requires that the ballot be rejected, as specified. This bill would provide that if a vote by mail ballot, mail ballot precinct ballot, or provisional ballot is processed using signature verification technology that determines the signatures do not compare, the elections official is required to visually examine and verify that the signatures do not compare before rejecting the ballot. By imposing additional duties on local elections officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 15101 of the Elections Code proposed by SB 29, to be operative only if SB 29 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2015, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Signed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2014 · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
21–10
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 27, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 28, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 6648.).
lower
Aug 27, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-10-4)
senate
Aug 27, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-22-1)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 9, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 2, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 13, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2530
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2530. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline