Unlawful detainer: nuisance: controlled substances.
Summary
Existing law establishes the criteria for determining when a tenant is guilty of unlawful detainer, including conduct involving illegally selling a controlled substance, or the commission of an offense involving the unlawful possession or use of illegal weapons or ammunition or the use of the premises to further that purpose. Any of those acts may be deemed to constitute committing a nuisance on the premises. Existing law authorizes, for real property situated in the City of Los Angeles only, a city prosecutor or city attorney to file an action for unlawful detainer in the name of the people against any person who is in violation of the nuisance or the illegal purpose provisions of the unlawful detainer provision described above, with respect to controlled substances. This bill would, until January 1, 2019, extend the unlawful detainer provisions above regarding illegally selling controlled substances, applicable only to real property situated in the City of Los Angeles, to also include real property situated in the County of Sacramento and the City of Oakland. The bill would require a court hearing an unlawful detainer action pursuant to these provisions to enter a specified order depending on whether grounds for an eviction or a partial eviction have been established. The court would have discretion to dismiss the action or stay the execution of an order of eviction for a reasonable time if the tenant can show, by clear and convincing evidence, that immediate eviction would pose extreme hardship that outweighs the benefit to the community. The bill would also, until January 1, 2019, require the County of Sacramento and the City of Oakland to comply with specified reporting requirements to the California Research Bureau, on or before January 20 annually, regarding prosecutions and evictions carried out under these provisions. The bill would require these jurisdictions to make a good faith effort to comply with the reporting requirements in order to bring unlawful detainer actions pursuant to these provisions. By establishing new reporting requirements for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Sacramento and the City of Oakland. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Apr 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Signed Sep 15, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2014 · Assembly Apr 24, 2014
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 35
Aug 20, 2014
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Sep 15, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 6324.).
lower
Aug 20, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-6)
senate
Aug 20, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 24).
upper
May 21, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 8, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 24, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-7)
assembly
Apr 9, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 25).
lower
Mar 13, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2485
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2485. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline